No paid ranking
A professional cannot pay to appear first, receive a higher score or be promoted inside a case.
INDEPENDENCE · FAIRNESS · ACCOUNTABILITY
OnPraxia Ethics & Allocation Charter
The decision maker’s interests come before provider promotion, commissions or commercial pressure.
Case-specific suitability
Selection considers jurisdiction, profession, specialism, verified standing, current workload, conflicts and the exact case requirements.
Independent recommendation
Assigned professionals contribute evidence and findings. They do not control the final OnPraxia recommendation or certificate.
Conflicts disclosed
Known conflicts, commercial relationships and limitations must be recorded and considered before assignment.
Human control
Automation and AI can identify gaps and draft actions, but authorised people approve evidence, findings and released recommendations.
Auditable decisions
Assignments, evidence, changes, approvals and final outputs are recorded so the process can be reviewed.
CASE ALLOCATION
How a provider is assigned
- Define the case scope and required specialist role
- Filter for professional standing, jurisdiction and availability
- Check conflicts and active workload
- Compare suitability reasons, not popularity
- Assign the professional and record responsibility
- Review performance and evidence inside the case
Need a case-specific investigation team?
Use Decision Discovery to see the likely checks, documents and professional roles before submitting your request.